|Voy. Barb. 2: 86. 1785; Fl. Atlantica 1798;|
| Curtis's Botanical Magazine 95; tab. 5773. 1869,;A very beautiful and sweet-scented spring flowering Iris, for which the Boyal Gardens are indebted to Mrs. Bodichon of Algiers. It has been referred by Alefeld to his genus Neubeckia, the characters of which, as given by Klatt in his revision of the order Iridete quoted above, seem to me of very doubtful generic value, depending mainly, if not altogether, on a very variable character — viz., the length of the tube of the perianth, " elongate " in Neubeckia, and " short," in Iris. A further diagnostic character is given to Neubeckia, in the persistent septum of the anthers, but this, if not accompanied by characters of higher importance, is not enough to found a genus upon. Klatt refers the I. longispatha of this work (Table 2528) doubtfully to this species; Ledebour, however (Flora Kossica, v. iv. p. 95), identifies the I. longispatha with I. biglumis, Vahl, a Dahurian and Siberian species, of a very different habit.
I. stylosa is a native of the hedges of Algeria, and is also found in Corfu and the Morea ; it was first published, without a specific name, in 1789, by Poiret, in his Voyage en Barbarie, v. ii. p. 96, and afterwards, first as I. stylosa, by Desfontaines in 1798, and then as I. unguicularis by Poiret, in 1799.
Descr. Rhizome creeping, as thick as the thumb, pale, and with pale brown membranous sheaths. Leaves one to one and a half foot long, one-sixth to one-third of an inch broad, erect, slender, flat, thin, striated, attenuated to long sharp points, bright green, shorter or longer than the scapes. Scape erect, slender, sheathed by slender appressed spathes, one-flowered. Ovary narrow, slender, one inch or more long. Flowers sweet-scented, two to two and a half inches diameter. Claws of the perianth segments yellowish, veined with red-purple, one and a half inch long, gradually dilating into broadly oblong spathulate, subequal, entire, obtuse, unbearded laminae ; outer leaflets recurved, pale violet, mottled below the middle with pale yellow, and with a strong deep yellow central band ; inner rounded at the top, apiculate, of a uniform pale violet colour. Stigmas deeply cleft into linear lobes which are acutely 2-fid at the apex, and usually single toothed on the outer margin. —J. D. H. May 1st, 1869.
|Anderson, E. B., (1971), Iris unguicularis. Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society, 96(8): 368-369.|
|Van T. 1900 as stylosa; 1938;|
|Gardeners' Chronicle, April 22, p251-252, 1911;|
| Dykes, The Genus Iris 54. 1913,Observations.
There seems to be no good reason for separating the Greek and Asia Minor forms of this Iris from the Algerian plant as distinct species. When Janka first described his I. cretensis, he was so intent on showing that it was not I. humilis-a plant from the Caucasus described by Bieberstein, under which name Sieber had wrongly identified his specimens from Crete, that he altogether forgot to mention I. unguicularis. In any case he would probably have found it difficult to give any differentia beyond mere size by which to separate his I. cretensis from I. unguicularis. For indeed there is no other real difference, and even Algerian specimens have leaves varying from 1-2 ft. in length and from 1/8-3/8 in. in breadth. Attempts have been made to separate them on the ground that the spathes of I. cretensis are more scarious than those of· I. unguicularis, whereas the truth is that the spathes of both are equally membranous and scarcely at all scarious. This is also the case with examples from Asia Minor (cf. Foster MS. in Hb. K.), from one of which the Bot. Mag. t. 6343 was prepared. It is undoubtedly true that the Greek plant is usually smaller than the Algerian but the two agree in possessing so many characters that are peculiar to them among Irises that they cannot reasonably be separated. They have in common the leathery linear foliage, the long perianth tube and above all the curious processes on the style branches that occur nowhere else among Irises. To the naked eye this looks like gold dust scattered over the back of the style branches. Under the microscope, however, we see transparent spheres poised on the top of equally transparent blunt cones. At some point inside the sphere there is a mass of golden dust-like grains and it is to these masses that the colour is due.
As far as can be ascertained from herbarium specimens, the Asia Minor form of this Iris has even narrower and more grassy leaves than the Greek (cf. Forbes' Lycian and Whittall's Smyrna specimens (K)) and I have in cultivation such a form which may well be an Asiatic example. The leaves are certainly narrower, more erect and grass-like than the somewhat horizontal fan-like growth of some plants which were obtained for me from the island of Cephalonia. On the other hand such specimens as Zahn's from Kalamata (B) show that there is considerable variation among the Greek forms. It is curious that both the Greek and the Asia Minor plants agree in not coming into flower until March or April, whereas the Algerian type flowers during mild weather at any time between November and April. This might, however, have been deduced a priori from the difference in climate.
Attempts have been made to separate the eastern and western forms specifically on differences in the shape of the falls and in the amount of division in the style crests. It is, however, difficult to attach any great value to these supposed differences, for variation in both these points will be found among seedlings obtained by self-fertilising the typical Algerian I. unguicularis. So far as my experience of the somewhat shy-flowering Eastern forms goes, the Greek plants more closely resemble the Algerian than do those from Asia Minor. The flowers of my plants from Cephalonia are practically identical with those of the Algerian type but only one-third as large. On the other hand, if a form of uncertain origin, sometimes to be obtained under the name of I. agrostifolia' may be taken to agree with herbarium specimens from Asia Minor, the flowers of the latter have more gradually expanding and more pointed fall blades. The white ground between the purple veins is much more visible on the blade and extends irregularly almost to the circumference, which is often edged with white. In such cases, the effect is strikingly delicate and attractive.
Much more real differences separate the variety lazica from all the other forms of the plant. Although it comes from almost the extreme Eastern end of the range of the species, whose leaves seem to diminish in width as we trace it from West to East, yet its foliage is broader and more distinctly ensiform-as opposed to linear-than that of any other form. Another point of real difference lies in the green spathe valves and in the much more sharply keeled outer valve. The tube, too, is not more than about 4 inches long. Moreover the stem is always produced to the length of 3-4 inches and it is not uncommon for the stems to be produced in pairs. If the var. lazzi:a only differed from typical I. ungu£cularis in the production of a stem, we could hardly separate them, for Bot. Mag. t. 577 3 and Tribout's specimen (C) from Caroubiers, Bone, show that other forms occasionally produce stems. My own plants of I. lazica have not yet flowered and to the kindness of Mr C. G. van Tubergen of Haarlem. veining on the blade was more conspicuous than that usually I owe the specimens that I have seen The colour was a dark purple and the seen on Algerian plants. In this respect lazica resembles Asia Minor forms much more closely, for in all the examples that I have seen the veining is continued over nearly the whole of the blade of the falls.
There are several garden varieties' of I. unguicularis, and these include more than one white form', of which some are certainly more floriferous than others. When the type is raised from seed, several slight variations in colour and markings occur and the various garden forms were probably obtained in this way.
There is, however, one very distinct form, known as speciosa. In my experience, this does not come into flower until March and its flowers have a fragrance quite distinct from that of the type and resembling that of the Sweet Pea. The foliage is dwarf, so that the flowers stand well above it. The blooms are of a deep reddish shade of purple and the peculiar ring of swellings where the bases of the segments of the flowers merge into the tube is not present, as far as I know, in any other form. It would be no surprise to find that this form is a local variety coming originally from Greece. In a warm dry climate, the cultivation of I. unguicularis presents no difficulty. In spring and early summer growth should be encouraged by unstinted moisture and even weak liquid manure•. After midsummer, at the latest, the plants should be allowed to roast in the sun and it will usually be found that the more thorough this process is, the larger will be the crop of flowers in the ensuing season. In obtaining this annual roasting, a position at the foot of a south wall is almost essential in England and if this south wall happens to be that of a greenhouse, with warm pipes on the inner side, the production of flowers will be less liable to cessation during frosty weather. In some rich damp soils, the growth of the plants is never ripened off in summer and, in such cases, the main hope of success lies in the construction of a raised bed against a south wall. The soil should be rendered light and porous by the plentiful addition of old mortar rubble. Sharp drainage is, of course, essential. Following the rule that Irises should be transplanted, when root-growth is about to begin, it will be found that there are two seasons at which this is possible, namely in April or September. It is a mistake to break up large clumps, for small pieces seldom flower. With a judicious top dressing in spring of a little good soil or very old manure, it will be found that the plants can be grown for years in the same position without exhausting the soil within reach of the roots.
Seeds are freely produced in most seasons and germinate readily. The seedlings grow fairly rapidly and begin to flower in their third or fourth year. I am inclined to think that home-raised seedlings are often hardier than imported plants. At any rate the severe frosts of 1911 killed all the buds-and they were very numerous-on a number of plants from the south of France that had been established for more than a year. Not one flower subsequently developed and yet dissection of the shoots showed large numbers of immature buds destroyed by the frost. On the other hand, some home-raised seedlings, although they ceased flowering during the cold weather, subsequently threw up more blooms.
In frosty weather, the clumps should be protected from the early morning sun, whose rays falling on the frosted plants seem far more destructive than the frost itself. I. unguicularis is well adapted for cultivation in large pots or pans. These should be sunk in the ground in some sheltered position during the spring and early summer and growth should be encouraged at that season by occasional waterings with weak liquid manure. From July onwards until about the end of September, the growths should be ripened by withholding excessive moisture and plants thus grown should flower abundantly, if brought into a cool house for the winter.
|Barr 1938 Berry 1938; A. Gard. M., R.H.S. 1924; J.R. H.S. 1927, shown by Rothschild as Stylosa;|
|jpg||Iris-unguicularis-theresa.jpg||manage||29 K||14 Jul 2016 - 18:09||BobPries||Carla Lankow photo|
|jpg||Iris-unguicularisdazlingEyes.jpg||manage||63 K||14 Jul 2016 - 18:09||BobPries||Rick Tasco photo|
|jpg||Iris-unguicularisKenwalker.jpg||manage||50 K||14 Jul 2016 - 18:17||BobPries||Ken Walker photo|
|jpg||Iris-unguicularisTyremann.jpg||manage||73 K||14 Jul 2016 - 18:20||BobPries||Paul Tyerman photo|
|jpg||Iris-unguicularisWalker2.jpg||manage||43 K||14 Jul 2016 - 18:27||BobPries||Ken Walker photo|
|jpg||Iris-unguicularisWalker3.jpg||manage||48 K||14 Jul 2016 - 18:38||BobPries||Ken Walker photo|
|jpg||Iris-unguicularisWalterButt.jpg||manage||69 K||14 Jul 2016 - 18:22||BobPries||Paul Tyerman photo|
|jpg||ungilarius9.jpg||manage||72 K||19 Dec 2013 - 17:06||Main.TLaurin||Photo by Matilija Nursery|
|jpg||unguialaris7.jpg||manage||101 K||19 Sep 2013 - 19:41||Main.TLaurin||Photo by Matilija Nursery|
|jpg||unguiclaris05.jpg||manage||163 K||02 Feb 2016 - 23:52||Main.TLaurin||Photo by Howard Dash|
|jpg||unguiculares_allthingsiris.jpg||manage||44 K||03 Sep 2010 - 01:18||UnknownUser||allthingsiris photo|
|jpg||Unguicularis_from_Dykes.jpg||manage||61 K||20 Apr 2010 - 13:16||UnknownUser||Unguicularis from Dykes' Genus iris|
|jpg||unguicularis_pries.jpg||manage||56 K||03 Sep 2010 - 01:19||UnknownUser||Pries photo|
|jpg||Unguicularis_reduced.jpg||manage||34 K||15 Sep 2010 - 17:22||UnknownUser||Bob Plank photo|
|jpg||unguicularis-flower1Ken_Walker.jpg||manage||50 K||03 Sep 2010 - 01:19||UnknownUser||Ken Walker photo|
|jpg||unguicularis-style-tube_Ken_Walker.jpg||manage||38 K||03 Sep 2010 - 01:20||UnknownUser||Ken Walker photo|
|jpg||unguicularis01.jpg||manage||116 K||19 Feb 2018 - 02:30||Main.TLaurin||Photo by Howard Dash|
|jpg||unguicularis02.jpg||manage||306 K||02 Feb 2018 - 03:44||Main.TLaurin||Photo by Superstition Iris Gardens|
|jpg||unguicularis03.jpg||manage||131 K||07 Mar 2016 - 14:44||Main.TLaurin||Photo by Chad Harris of Mt. Pleasant Iris Farm|
|jpg||unguicularis04.jpg||manage||108 K||07 Mar 2016 - 14:52||Main.TLaurin||Photo by Chad Harris of Mt. Pleasant Iris Farm|
|jpg||unguicularis1.jpg||manage||125 K||08 Mar 2017 - 12:07||Main.TLaurin||Photo by Howard Dash|
|jpg||unguicularis10.jpg||manage||25 K||22 Jan 2014 - 20:16||Main.TLaurin||Photo by Iris of Sissinghurst,UK|
|jpg||unguicularis8.jpg||manage||115 K||19 Sep 2013 - 23:56||Main.TLaurin||Photo by Matilija Nursery|
|jpg||unguiicularis4.jpg||manage||127 K||06 Dec 2016 - 12:56||Main.TLaurin||Photo by Howard Dash|
|jpg||unguiularius01.jpg||manage||94 K||05 Jan 2015 - 12:20||Main.TLaurin||Photo by Matilija Nursery|
|jpg||ungularius06.jpg||manage||109 K||29 Jan 2019 - 12:21||Main.TLaurin||Photo by Howard Dash.|